Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Roka Sports, Inc.
as 3:2026cv02383
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kelly
Defendant:
Roka Sports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv03806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
KELLY v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2025cv03997
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KELLY
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GANS v. AHMED et al
as 1:2025cv00106
Defendant:
OFFICER NIZAM AHMED, DENNIS SFOGLIA, SERGEANT ANDREW WEISS and others
Plaintiff:
SHAHIOA GANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M.K. a Minor et al v. Swickard Eugene, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv02017
Defendant:
BMW of Eugene, Swickard Eugene, LLC and Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kelly, M.K. a Minor and Rena Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Kelly v. Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv00633
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Armoni Johnson v. Walter Koehler, et al
as 24-2054
Defendant:
MARY PHILLIPS, F. MCCABE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LUZERNE COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
ARMONI MASUD JOHNSON
Acrisure, LLC v. Kelly et al
as 1:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Acrisure, LLC
Defendant:
Matthew Kelly, Christopher Iovino, Robert Kempner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
STANLEY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
RE'XAVION JAVARIES STANLEY
Defendant:
AARON WILLIAMS, DUSTIN PATTERSON, MATTHEW KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
