Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Ellington v. County of Monroe
as 19-806
Defendant:
County of Monroe, Town of Gates, Monroe County Sheriff, Patrick M. O'Flynn and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Todd Sutherland and Deputy Matthew Whiting
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Charles R. Ellington
WHITE v. BOWEN
as 5:2018cv00429
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN MICHAEL THOMAS, COMMISSIONER GREGORY DOZIER and WARDEN TOMMY BOWEN
Plaintiff:
JONATHON MATTHEW WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Jason Matthew Whiting
as 17-6229
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JASON MATTHEW WHITING, a/k/a Jason Whiting
Ellington v. County of Monroe et al
as 6:2015cv06310
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Ellington
Defendant:
County of Monroe , Monroe County Sheriff Patrick M. O'Flynn , Matthew Whiting and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Ellis v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 15-1951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Municipality, Government Entity, OFFICER MATTHEW WHITE, City of Pittsburgh Police, Community Relations Officer, JEFFREY W. LABELLA, City of Pittsburgh Police Officer, Indv. & Entity and others
Harris v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 1:2014cv03145
Plaintiff:
Marc Harris
Defendant:
John W. Hickenlooper , John (I) W. Hickenlooper , Terry Maketa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Halpern v. White
as 1:2014cv07702
Plaintiff:
John Halpern
Defendant:
Matthew White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hatcher et al v. Anderson et al
as 2:2014cv00213
Plaintiff:
Shamsiddeen Isiah Hatcher, Mosiah Armstrong, Dakota J Dorton and others
Defendant:
Wayne Anderson, Gregg Simcox, Brenda Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. USA
as 4:2014cv00297
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Matthew White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
White v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2014cv00287
Movant:
Matthew White
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
