Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 58,343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01131
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 - Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability Definition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01192
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BROWN v. VANDER ZANDEN et al
as 7:2024cv00040
Plaintiff: ARMAND RASHAD BROWN
Defendant: TYLER VANDER ZANDEN, CHRIS HICKS and MATTHEW DELACRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03003
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Notarnicola v. Oklahoma Indigent Defense System et al
as 6:2024cv00145
Plaintiff: Michael Notarnicola
Defendant: Oklahoma Indigent Defense System and Matthew R. Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnsworth v. Sellers et al
as 2:2024cv00610
Plaintiff: Max Burnsworth
Defendant: Trent Alexander Sellers, Brian Edward Ries, Justin Matthew DePalma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01495
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Trais Haire v. Matthew Burns, et al
as 24-1678
Plaintiff: TRAIS FERNANDEZ HAIRE
Defendant: MATTHEW BURNS, sued as Lt Burns, JEREMY STANIEC, Officer, sued as Lt Stanrec, JEREMY WESTRA, sued as Cpt Westra and others
Matthew Logan v. SEC
as 24-1095
Petitioner: Matthew R. Logan
Respondent: Securities and Exchange Commission

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?