Cases 1 - 10 of 3,092
McDonald v. USA
as 3:2024cv00451
Petitioner:
Dominic Xavier McDonald
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McDonald v. Lumpkin
as 24-40269
Petitioner:
Joseph Christopher McDonald
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Omar et al (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Ellu M. Omar, Demetrius M. Wallace, Jerren R. Pack and others
Defendant:
Diggins, Line, Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kasyjanski v. Allyene et al
as 1:2024cv02278
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Kasyjanski
Defendant:
Jennifer Allyene, Kelly Lotnard, Nicole Chimenti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Angela Dunbar
as 24-6363
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
ANGELA DUNBAR, WARDEN TIMOTHY S. STEWART, MS. STAR and others
Abram v. Lien et al
as 6:2024cv02017
Plaintiff:
Christopher W Abram
Defendant:
Lien Sergeant, Huckfeldt Officer, Officer Aneweer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGuire v. Cheney et al
as 3:2024cv05027
Plaintiff:
Tommas McGuire
Defendant:
Maleia Cheney and McDonald County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John McDonald v. District Attorney Dauphin County, et al
as 24-1650
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE MCDONALD
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY, WARDEN FRACKVILLE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
RUTLEDGE v. DEVORE-GUIFARRO et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Defendant:
BRACHER, E DEVORE-GUIFARRO, BODIFORD and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE VINCENT RUTLEDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
