Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 321
Joseph Lukuta, III v. Lena Angelella, et al
as 24-1902
Plaintiff: JOSEPH LUKUTA, III, Individually doing business as Lokuta's Garage Coporation
Defendant: LENA ANGELELLA, Chief of Police, Pittston Township Police Department, DAVID SLEZAK, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Pittston Township, JOSEPH HAWK, Vice Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Pittston Township and others
Mary Turner, et al v. Lafayette County School District, et al
as 24-1928
Plaintiff: Mary Turner, Individually and as next friend of Torrance Turner, a minor, Lucy Cheatham, Individually and as next friend of Andrew Cheatham, a minor, Mary Rose, Individually and as next friend of Victor Rose and others
Defendant: Lafayette County School District, Larry Hudson, Individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent of Schools for the Lewisville School District No. 1, A Public Body Corporate, Hollis Sasser, Individually and in his official capacity as President of the Board of Education of the Lewisville School District No. 1, A Public Body Corporate and others
Intervenor: Arkansas Department of Education and Arkansas State Board of Education
Richard Kowalewitch v. City of Virginia Beach
as 24-1309
Plaintiff: RICHARD KOWALEWITCH and DONALD EDWARDS
Defendant: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL, ROBERT DYER, In their official capacity as members of Virginia Beach City Council and others
Hansen v. Utah Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 2:2024cv00203
Plaintiff: David Hansen
Defendant: Utah Board of Pardons and Parole, Members of the Board of Pardons and State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Poe, et al v. Drummond, et al
as 23-5110
Plaintiff / Appellant: PETER POE, by and through his parents and next friends, Paula Poe and Patrick Poe, PAULA POE, PATRICK POE and others
Plaintiff: DR. SHAUNA LAWLIS, on behalf of her patients
Defendant / Appellee: GENTNER F DRUMMOND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, STEVEN KATSIS, M.D., in his official capacity as President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision, TREVOR NUTT, in his official capacity as Vice-President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
MIB, LLC, et al v. Mike Field, et al
as 23-2839
Plaintiff / Appellant: MIB, LLC, RYAN POLOKOFF and SABINE KISSE
Defendant / Appellee: MIKE FIELD, individually and in their official capcities as Members of the Board of Zoning Appeals for the City of Noblesville, Indiana, DAVE BURTNER, JIM HANLON and others
Williams v. Sanders et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00873
Plaintiff: Shawn Williams
Defendant: Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Tim Griffin, Joe Profiri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimberly Diei v. Randy Boyd, et al
as 23-5771
Plaintiff / Appellant: KIMBERLY DIEI
Defendant / Appellee: RANDY BOYD, in his individual and official capacity as President of the Univeristy of Tennessee System, CHRISTA GEORGE, in her individual and official capacity as Chair of the University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy's Professional Conduct Committee, BRAD BOX and others
Curtis Brooks v. Tonya Chapman
as 23-6825
Plaintiff / Appellant: CURTIS RAY BROOKS
Defendant / Appellee: TONYA D. CHAPMAN, Ex-Chair/Virginia Parole Board, KEMBA S. PRADIA, Ex-Vice Chair/Virginia Parole Board, A. LINCOLN JAMES, Ex-Member/Virginia Parole Board and others
Defendant: RALPH NORTHAM, Ex-Governor/Chief Executive of Virginia

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?