Cases 1 - 10 of 302
Moore v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01085
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Moore
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Frank Strata, Jon Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Martin
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Michael R Moore
Defendant:
Howard C Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Portsmouth City Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Torrey Lee Sutton
Defendant:
Portsmouth City Jail, Lt. Col. Clemons, Major Riddick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOORE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. MOORE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Hollamon v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-341
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA AARON HOLLAMON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, MICHAEL R. MOORE, LAPD Police Chief, S. SMITH, Officer; Serial No. 33751 and others
Moore v. Hughes
as 2:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Michael Ernest Moore
Respondent:
Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BUTLER v. OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE INC et al
as 3:2023cv21251
Plaintiff:
Samantha Butler
Defendant:
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., Michael Shane Moore, Randall Hobbs Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Vue v. Moore et al
as 2:2023cv00981
Plaintiff:
Bee Vue
Defendant:
Michael D Moore and Officer Anna Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Wilcox et al
as 1:2023cv01931
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Moore
Defendant:
Frank Wilcox, Robert Leonard and Brandon Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ni Fed. Question: Negotiable Instrument
Wood v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 6:2023cv01015
Plaintiff:
Timothy M. Wood
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Barbara Ann Moore, Michael Raymond Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
