Cases 11 - 20 of 34
DAVIS v. GERON et al
as 4:2019cv00109
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. DAVIS
Defendant:
JUSTIN CAMPBELL, JANET PAGE and TAMMY GERON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. GRIFFIN et al
as 4:2019cv00085
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. DAVIS
Defendant:
SAMANTHA GRIFFIN, SUPERIOR COURT 3 and FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. FLOYD COUNTY OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 4:2019cv00086
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. DAVIS
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and CHRISTA J. PRATHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. NEW ALBANY INDIANA et al
as 4:2019cv00076
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. DAVIS
Defendant:
NEW ALBANY INDIANA and WALMART SUPERCENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. NEW ALBANY, INDIANA POLICE DEPT et al
as 4:2019cv00078
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. DAVIS
Defendant:
C. SHULTZ, B. KORTE and NEW ALBANY, INDIANA POLICE DEPT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Miller et al
as 1:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Charles J. Wilhelm, Charlene Parker, Van Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liviz v. Supreme Court of the United State of America, et al
as 1:2018cv12620
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court, Louisiana Supreme Court, Kansas Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist ilya Liviz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Carr v. County Of Sullivan , New York et al
as 1:2016cv06850
Plaintiff:
James Carr
Defendant:
Sullivan County District Attorney's Office, Brendan Pavese, Travis Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Davis, et al v. City of Philadelphia
as 15-2937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. DAVIS
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GLOBAL SALES CALL CENTER LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Richmond v. Brooklyn Center PD et al
as 4:2015cv04050
Plaintiff:
Courtney Richmond
Defendant:
Brooklyn Center PD, Hennepin County Jail, Hennepin County Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
