Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Hardymon v. Kent et al.
as 1:2024cv00799
Plaintiff: Shane J Hardymon
Defendant: Scott Kent and Michael P. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00989
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024mc00989
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Reverend Beck v. William Barr, et al
as 24-1144
Plaintiff: Reverend Beck, Phd
Defendant: William P. Barr, John G. Roberts, Lavenski R. Smith and others
Davis v. Wake County, North Carolina
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff: Michael Scott Davis
Defendant: Wake County, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beck v. Barr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv03863
Plaintiff: Reverend Doctor Beck
Defendant: William Pelham Barr, John G. Roberts, Lavenski R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01373
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
HODGES et al v. DAVIS
as 3:2023cv00039
Plaintiff: PATROUSKI HODGES and NAKISHA WEST
Defendant: MICHAEL NORTON DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. U.S. GOVERNMENT
as 1:2023cv00087
Plaintiff: MICHAEL L. DABIS and MICHAEL L. DAVIS
Defendant: U.S. GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Payne et al v. Davis et al
as 4:2022cv00588
Plaintiff: Rebecca J Payne, Michael D King and James L Crowder
Defendant: Michael C Davis, Nathan Rice and John W Staley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?