Cases 1 - 10 of 34
CAHILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27653
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CAHILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MALDONADO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv03474
Plaintiff:
MARCO MALDONADO
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DETECTIVE MICHAEL CAHILL, DETECTIVE HERBERTO APONTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cahill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05582
Plaintiff:
David Michael Cahill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Taniela Kivalu v. Northcentral University, et al
as 21-16811
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TANIELA F. KIVALU
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHCENTRAL UNIVERSITY, TRUSTEE BOARD MEMBERS OF NORTHCENTRAL UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL CAHILL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00379
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
OREILLY et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2021cv00313
Plaintiff:
JOHN SNYDER, JOSEPH OREILLY, PAUL SULOCK and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cahill v. Watts et al
as 8:2020cv02675
Defendant:
Robert Alford, Patricia Alderman, Carolyn Scruggs and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Cahill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv21476
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lamont Campfield v. Raymond Dougherty, et al
as 19-2814
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DAVE HUNTER, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, HUGH COLIHAN, Assistant District Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMONT CAMPFIELD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
