Cases 61 - 70 of 504
Edgar Vasquez, et al v. Felicia Ponce, et al
as 22-55563
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDGAR VASQUEZ
Petitioner:
LANCE AARON WILSON and MAURICE SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
FELICIA PONCE, Warden and MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Director of the Bureau of Prisons
Abernethy v. Carvajal
as 3:2022cv03284
Petitioner:
Maria Abernethy
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Biron v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2022cv01501
Plaintiff:
Lisa A. Biron
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Carvajal and Mistelle Starr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILLENS v. CARVAJAL et al
as 1:2022cv01645
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GILLENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, DOE #1, K. CRADDOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanson Wilson-Millan v. BOP, et al
as 22-5157
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hanson Wilson-Millan
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Michael Carvajal, Director
Hajati v. Garland et al
as 3:2022cv00711
Petitioner:
George Hajati
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Michael Carvajal and Alix M. McLearen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SOURESRAFIL v. CARVAJAL et al
as 2:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
OMID SOURESRAFIL
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, KALIS, T. RULE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Abel v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv01630
Plaintiff:
Robert Abel
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FNU/LNU, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
SUGGS v. MOSER et al
as 3:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
RICARDO SUGGS, JR.
Defendant:
VICKI MOSER and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
