Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Azzara v. Fitzpatrick
as 1:2017cv06904
Petitioner:
Paul Azzara
Respondent:
Michael J. Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ware v. Hawthorn et al
as 1:2016cv00489
Petitioner:
Ulysses T Ware
Respondent:
Zack J Hawthorn, Marcia A Crone, David A O'Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Pollard v. United States Parole Commissio
as 16-2918
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jonathan J. Pollard
Respondent - Appellee:
United States Parole Commission, J. Patricia Wilson Smoot, solely in her capacity as Chair of the United States Parole Commission, United States Probation Office, for the Southern District of New York and others
Pollard v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 1:2015cv09131
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission , J. Patricia Wilson Smoot , United States Probation Office for the Southern District of New York and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan J. Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FITZPATRICK v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2014cv06118
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. FITZPATRICK
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, C. CHRISTIE, STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-35031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick et al
as 2:2012cv02938
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
Brian Fitzpatrick, Dianne Fitzpatrick and Gold Mountain Winery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Seacoast National Bank v. M/Y Seawolf et al
as 2:2010cv14095
Plaintiff:
Seacoast National Bank
Defendant:
M/Y Seawolf, Michael J Fitzpatrick and Debra A Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty - Foreclose Ship's Mortgage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
