Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Taylor, et al v. McDermott, et al
as 21-1083
Respondent / Appellee:
JEROME P. MCDERMOTT, Sheriff, Norfolk, County, Massachusetts and JOHN GIBBONS, United States Marshal, District of Massachusetts
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL L. TAYLOR and PETER MAXWELL TAYLOR
Taylor et al v. McDermott et al
as 4:2020cv11272
Petitioner:
Michael L Taylor and Peter Maxwell Taylor
Respondent:
Jerome P McDermott and John Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor et al v. McDermott et al
as 1:2020cv11272
Petitioner:
Michael L Taylor and Peter Maxwell Taylor
Respondent:
Jerome P McDermott and John Gibons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maling v. Laska et al
as 3:2019cv01076
Defendant:
Michael L. Taylor, Ronald D. Vitiello, Patrick O'Brien and others
Plaintiff:
Ezra Dave Gipan Maling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maling v. Laska et al
as 4:2019cv00313
Defendant:
Matthew T Albence, Kevin Demerin, Mitchell Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Ezra Dave Gipan Maling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01034
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hodges v. Taylor et al
as 4:2015cv02736
Plaintiff:
Brenda Hodge
Defendant:
Michael L Taylor, P & S Transportation LLC, P & S Transportation Brokerage LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Taylor v. Doug Cook
as 15-5449
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUG COOK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
