Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Vigniero v. Leggett et al
as 5:2024ct03180
Defendant:
Andrea Pino, Richard Neumeyer, James Brock and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Vigniero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRUESDALE v TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Adaesha Truesdale, ALFRED ALLISON, ALICIA BOWE and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC, TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC, TMX Finance of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Oakley v. Barrese et al
as 3:2020cv01996
Defendant:
Esquire Dave Cherundolo and Judge Michael Barrese
Plaintiff:
Michael Oakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caesar et al v. Calcasieu Parish School Board et al
as 2:2016cv00022
Defendant:
School Board of Calcasieu Parish , Drew Fontenot , Tisha Wittington and others
Plaintiff:
Audrenne Caesar , Leonard Caesar and Michon Terri Caesar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Oakley et al v. Jackson National Life Insurance Company
as 3:2015cv05073
Plaintiff:
John W. Oakley, V and Scott Michael Oakley
Defendant:
Jackson National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Oakley, et al
as 13-6205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERMAN TRACY CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL OAKLEY and OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Oakley v. Hopkins County Jail
as 5:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Michael Oakley
Defendant:
Hopkins County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oakley v. Hopkins County Jail
as 4:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
Michael Oakley
Defendant:
Hopkins County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Oakley, et al
as 13-6054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERMAN TRACY CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL OAKLEY and OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Clark v. Oakley, et al
as 13-6050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERMAN TRACY CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL OAKLEY and OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
