Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Dunaway-Lukens v. Doctor at Hill Road Correctional Facility
as 3:2023cv02458
Plaintiff:
Michael Raymond Dunaway-Lukens
Defendant:
Doctor at Hill Road Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carballa v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al. (Hillsborough)
as 8:2021cv02315
Petitioner:
Michael Raymond Carballa
Respondent:
State of Florida, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lukens v. Medvan et al
as 3:2020cv02772
Plaintiff:
Michael Raymond Lukens
Defendant:
Deputy Mucola, Sgt Gudmundson, Dr. Medvan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Hendrix
as 2:2020cv00024
Defendant:
Hendricks and Dwayne Hendrix
Plaintiff:
Michael Raymond Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Larson v. Estes et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv01095
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, Deborah Toney and Dewayne Estes
Plaintiff:
Michael Raymond Larson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MORENCY et al v. CITY OF ALLENTOWN et al
as 5:2019cv05304
Defendant:
OFFICER ERIC BLOOD, OFFICER DIEHL, CITY OF ALLENTOWN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAYMOND MORENCY and ROEUTH MORENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karras v. UTMB Medical Branch Sr. Practice Manager
as 6:2019cv00522
Defendant:
UTMB Medical Branch Sr. Practice Manager
Plaintiff:
Michael Raymond Karras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larson v. Toney et al
as 5:2019cv01671
Respondent:
Toney and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Petitioner:
Michael Raymond Larson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fremin v. Tuttle et al
as 5:2017cv01670
Plaintiff:
Michael Raymond Fremin
Defendant:
Tuttle, Humphrey and Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kesterson v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv03040
Petitioner:
Michael Raymond Kesterson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
