Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Ari Bailey v. BOP, et al
as 16-5376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ari Bailey
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jose Santana, Chief, Designation Sentence and Computation Center, Ike C. Eichenlaub, Mid-Atlantic Regional Director and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv02942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2014cv00716
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOSE A. SANTANA, IKE C. EICHENLAUB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Smith v. Kennewick Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv05123
Plaintiff:
Michael S Smith
Defendant:
Kennewick Police Department and Benton County Prosecutor's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruce Matson v. Diego Alarcon
as 10-2352
Petitioner:
BRUCE H. MATSON, Trustee of the LandAmerica Financial Group, Incorporated Liquidated Trust
Respondent:
DIEGO ALARCON, EMILY E. ANDERS, STEVEN P. BAKER and others
Bruce Matson v. Diego Alarcon
as 10-276
Petitioner:
BRUCE H. MATSON, Trustee of the LandAmerica Financial Group, Incorporated Liquidated Trust
Respondent:
DIEGO ALARCON, EMILY E. ANDERS, STEVEN P. BAKER and others
Robinson v. Ledesma, et al
as 10-1504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL E.D. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HECTOR LEDESMA, Warden, HAROLD SUTHERLAND, Regional SIS Coordinator (South East Region) FNU LNU, MICHAEL S. SMITH, Captain, SIS MDC, Guaynabo and others
Smith v. Warden of Mansfield Correctional Institution
as 1:2008cv01141
Petitioner:
Michael S. Smith
Respondent:
Warden of Mansfield Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
