Cases 1 - 10 of 411
Michael Parker v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company Limited Partnership
as 24-1406
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. PARKER and PATRICE PARKER
Intervenor:
ALICE MEJIA
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY, Limited Partnership and NEWREZ LLC, d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Collins v. Advocate Aurora Health Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Shawanda V Collins
Defendant:
Advocate Aurora Health Inc, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pierce v. Lubbock Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Alexander Eric Pierce
Defendant:
Lubbock Police Department, Jasmine Garcia, Jonathon J. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moye v. Eshbach et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Moye
Defendant:
Judge David C. Eshbach and Isaiah D. Emenheiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kleiber v. Virani
as 3:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Kleiber
Defendant:
Farid Virani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brewer v. Talley et al
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Travon S Brewer
Defendant:
Michael T Talley and Jonesboro Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Kleiber v. Walz et al
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Kleiber
Defendant:
Governor Tim Walz, Lt. Governor Peggy Flanagan, Attorney General Keith Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blagmon v. Hanover County
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Blagmon
Defendant:
Hanover County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
