Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Thomson v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
Shawn M Thomson and Shawn Michael Thomson
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briggs v. Jones et al
as 4:2021cv01200
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Eugene Briggs, Jr.
Defendant:
CO1 William Jones, Sgt. Ethan Jones, Sgt. Michael Thomson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomson et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2019cv10404
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL THOMSON and CARLA THOMSON
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00236
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Thomson v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc. and Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453 Class Action Fairness Act
Thomson v. Harley Davidson Credit Corporation
as 5:2016cv00606
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomson
Defendant:
Harley Davidson Credit Corporation
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
US v. Charles Thomson
as 14-4167
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES MICHAEL THOMSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al v. Thomson
as 4:2012cv00736
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Michael Thomson and Monica Wise
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Thomson v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
as 4:2012cv00578
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomson
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
