Cases 11 - 20 of 256
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10546
Plaintiff:
BRYON MICHAEL WOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wood v. TRVST, Inc.
as 8:2023cv01724
Plaintiff:
Michael Wood
Defendant:
TRVST, INC and TRVST, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Manuel Menendez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Larson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2023cv01823
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Jodi Harpstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOODS v. HURT et al
as 1:2023cv01019
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Defendant:
B. HURT, BLANTON, BOOKOUT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2071
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WOODS v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2023cv00607
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 2:2023cv01071
Petitioner:
ANTHONY MICHAEL WOODS
Respondent:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. Vandergriff
as 4:2023mc09002
Petitioner:
Craig Michael Wood
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
