Cases 21 - 30 of 243
POLIDI v. MENDEL et al
as 1:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
Richard Polidi
Defendant:
Elizabeth U. Mendel, James O. Payne, Michelle K. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv03152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
K. et al v. Sonoma County et al
as 3:2022cv01202
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE K., P. K., KAYA K. and others
Defendant:
Sonoma County, JOSE A. CENTENO, GINA M. CENTENO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jason Casillas, et al v. George Ruben, et al
as 22-55201
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON CASILLAS, MICHELE K. CASILLAS and MICHELE KUUIPO CASILLAS
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE RUBEN and DOUGLAS MANN
Jason Casillas et al v. George Ruben et al
as 5:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Jason Casillas, Michele Casillas and Michele K Casillas
Defendant:
George Ruben and Douglas Mann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00075
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Gregory v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2021cv04184
Plaintiff:
Garland Ray Gregory, Jr.
Defendant:
State of South Dakota, South Dakota Department of Corrections and Judge Michelle K. Comer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoyle et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2021cv02512
Plaintiff:
Martin David Hoyle and B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Michelle K. Lee, James Donald Smith, Sally C. Medley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris et al v. West Sunshine Auto Sales et al
as 6:2021cv03176
Plaintiff:
Michele K. Harris and Edgar S. Harris
Defendant:
West Sunshine Auto Sales, Plaza Tire Services, Dan Stark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3301
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
