Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Knapp et al v. Compass Minnesota, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Preston Byron Knapp and Michelle Nichole Knapp
Defendant:
Compass Minnesota, LLC and Daniel Philip Hollerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MATTATALL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18254
Plaintiff:
MICHELE NICHOLE MATTATALL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Hardeman et al
as 4:2021cv03082
Plaintiff:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Jacqueline Patrice Hardeman, Michelle Nichole Hardeman and James Coleman Hardeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NICHOLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv40922
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE NICHOLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00504
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
VAUGHN v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00001
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE NICHOLE VAUGHN
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Owen et al v. Angry Crab Shack Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv04415
Plaintiff:
Terri Rossi Owen , Shawn Thorson , Susan Krueger and others
Defendant:
Angry Crab Shack Corporation, Angry Crab Franchise LLC, Angry Crab Shack BBQ LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Frederick Ives v. Michelle Nichols, et al
as 16-15342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK W. IVES
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE NICHOLS, Nurse, WARDEN, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
IVES v. NICHOLS et al
as 3:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK W IVES
Defendant:
MICHELLE NICHOLS, R COMERFORD, MICHAEL CREWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Nichols
as 3:2013cv00221
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Stephanie Michelle Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
