Cases 41 - 50 of 1,711
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01087
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Milton, Tyler v. Kijek et al
as 3:2023cv00548
Plaintiff:
Tyler Lee Milton
Defendant:
Kijek, Aronson, Schumann and others
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Monti et al
as 3:2023cv02685
Plaintiff:
Milton Rodriguez
Defendant:
Daniel Monti, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and St Louis University Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milton v. Stover
as 3:2023cv01027
Petitioner:
Kevin Milton
Respondent:
Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anderson v. Roman et al
as 1:2023cv04863
Plaintiff:
Milton Anderson
Defendant:
L. Roman and Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Ham et al
as 2:2023cv02708
Plaintiff:
Milton Wilson
Defendant:
Jose Ham, Daniel Fleischman and Randy Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAMUELS v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv03681
Petitioner:
MILTON SAMUELS
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Milton Taylor v. Commissioner Delaware Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-2160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MILTON TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Milton Lancaster v. David Millis
as 23-6614
Petitioner / Appellant:
MILTON E. LANCASTER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID MILLIS
Dortch v. Jeffreys
as 8:2023cv00262
Petitioner:
Milton B. Dortch, Jr.
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
