Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Bray v. Rhythm Management Group, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv03142
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Bray
Defendant:
Rhythm Management Group, LLC, Rhythm Management Group, PLLC, Rhythm Management Group Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act - Liability
BRAY v. RHYTHM MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv03089
Plaintiff:
RHONDA BRAY
Defendant:
RHYTHM MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, RHYTHM MANAGEMENT GROUP, PLLC, RHYTHM MANAGEMENT GROUP CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Su v. Destiny Healthcare Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04982
Plaintiff:
Julie A Su
Defendant:
DESTINY HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., an Illinois corporation;, MIRZA BAIG, an individual; and, SONIA CHALAL, an individual, and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ignite International Limited v. Higher Connection LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02184
Plaintiff:
Ignite International Limited
Defendant:
Higher Connection LLC, Zachariah James Gleason, Mirza Baig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Nasim Baig v. Attorney General United States
as 21-1692
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
NASIM MIRZA BAIG
Ned James v. Kim Butler, et al
as 16-3372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NED JAMES
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM BUTLER, SUDARSHAN SUNEJA, Doctor, MIRZA BAIG and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Xenon Health, L.L.C., et al v. Mirza Baig
as 15-20627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
XENON HEALTH, L.L.C. and HAROON W. CHAUDHRY, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
MIRZA BAIG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
