Cases 11 - 20 of 1,310
MCCLEE v. MARTE et al
as 1:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
LaMarquist McClee
Defendant:
Ruben Marte and Monroe County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hines v. Foot Locker
as 24-576
Plaintiff:
SHERELL ANN HINES
Defendant:
FOOT LOCKER, INC., SHOE SENCES, MONROE COUNTY and others
Bennett v. Skinner et al
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Hubert Edd Bennett
Defendant:
Kalieb Skinner and Monroe County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hernandez Cuevas, Silvio Omar v. Monroe County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2024cv10016
Plaintiff:
Silvio Omar Hernandez Cuevas
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriff Department and Unknown Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Underwood v. Monroe County Jail
as 1:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Travon D. Underwood
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Proctor v. Vican et al
as 3:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
James H. Proctor, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge Ronald E. Vican, Mark Peter Pazauhanich, Donald Fernbach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MONROE COUNTY, MICHIGAN v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
MONROE COUNTY, MICHIGAN
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Woodford v. Monroe County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv10313
Plaintiff:
Darryl Dominic Woodford
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail, Davis, McGary and others
Underwood v. Monroe County Hospital
as 1:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Travon D. Underwood
Defendant:
Monroe County Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
