Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Long v. D.O.C.-Department of Corrections-MN et al
as 0:2023cv03692
Plaintiff:
Reginald B. Long
Defendant:
D.O.C.-Department of Corrections-MN, Ramsey County Correctional Facility-Workhouse, A.P.S.-Advance Practice Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodson v. Custer et al
as 7:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr.
Defendant:
Captain Custer, Ms. Lt. Saville, Mr. Lt. Derito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Woodward v. Transport Officer
as 20-7275
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. LT. SCARBOROUGH, TRANSPORT OFFICER 1, TRANSPORT OFFICER 2 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT WOODWARD
Broughton v. Shepard et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00399
Defendant:
Mr. Lt. McCovery, Sgt. Lovejoy, John Crow and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Gerell Broughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Lopez v. Bruce, MD et al
as 1:2020cv02518
Defendant:
J. Ramos, Marilyn Garcia, MD, MDC H.S.A./MDC Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Perez-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McSWAIN v. HENDREN et al
as 2:2017cv00158
Defendant:
MR. ROBERT D. BUGHER, MR. ANDREW COLE, MRS. P. GUFFEY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE McSWAIN
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarence Alston v. E. Wright
as 14-6699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE ALSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
E. WRIGHT, Warden, S. M. HARDY, C.O. and T. SITES, C.O.
Defendant:
BLOWE, Mr.; Major, RAMSEY, Ms.; Grievance Coordinator, MACKLIN, Ms.; Grievance Alt. and others
O'Diah v. The State of New York
as 13-2066
Petitioner:
Aror Ark O'Diah
Respondent:
The State of New York, Brian Fischer, Michael Corcoran and others
Michael Ellis v. Elder
as 09-6344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELDER, Officer, BOOKER, Mr.; Assistant Warden, HARPER, Mr.; Sgt. Institution Investigator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
