Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Johns III v. City of Houston, Texas et al
as 4:2025cv04661
Plaintiff:
Clinton Donald Johns III
Defendant:
City of Houston, Texas, Houston Police Department, Houston Police Department Internal Affairs Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mosley v. McFarlene et al
as 3:2024cv00056
Defendant:
Sgt. Wright, Lt. Chambers, Arlene Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grant v. PETER WOLF & ASSOCIATES PC et al
as 9:2022cv04262
Plaintiff:
Terry Lennette Grant
Defendant:
PETER WOLF & ASSOCIATES PC, Peter Wolf, Esq, WOLF & MOGIL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Campbell v. Bennett et al
as 4:2020cv00309
Defendant:
Clerk Patricia S. Connor, Ms. Christa T. Bell, David Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Randall Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Campbell v. Hollie Bennett
as 19-2149
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. CATHERINE A. STONE, MR. CHARLTON B. HALL, MR. DEAN GRIGG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES R. CAMPBELL
Campbell v. Bennett et al
as 0:2019cv00973
Defendant:
Ms. Christa T. Bell, Mr. David B. Love, South Carolina Bar and others
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Abney et al
as 3:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Proctor Gray, III
Defendant:
Ms Beverly Abney, Mr Stanley Green and Ms Lyn Frye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstead v. Social Security Administration
as 8:2013cv00277
Plaintiff:
Ms. Beverly Armstead
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HALL v. MS. BEVERLY HASTINGS et al
as 3:2013cv04340
Petitioner:
STACY HALL
Respondent:
MS. BEVERLY HASTINGS, EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JEFFREY CHIESA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
