Cases 11 - 20 of 32
FAUNTLEROY v. CLARK
as 1:2019cv00182
Defendant:
MS. CLARK
Plaintiff:
CHARLES FAUNTLEROY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plumer v. Williams et al
as 2:2019cv01551
Defendant:
Charles Williams, Ms. Clarke, Mr. Collier and others
Plaintiff:
Ontavious Derenta Plumer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOLDBERG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv06024
Plaintiff:
MARK GOLDBERG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DAVID E ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joan Malone v. District of Columbia Housing, et al
as 16-7115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joan Frances M. Malone
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia Housing Authority, CIH Properties Inc., Agent (DCHA), Sibley Plaza Management Office and others
Vincent Taylor v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6910
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT KYLE TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Department of Corrections, MR. WALKER, Warden, DR. NWAKUCHA, Medical Doctor and others
Harris v. Northup et al
as 5:2016ct03039
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Harris
Defendant:
E. M. Northup, J. D. Bruno, Ms. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Taylor v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT KYLE TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director D.O.C., MR. WALKER, Warden, DR. NWAKUCHA, Medical Doctor and others
Taylor v. Clarke et al
as 1:2015cv01188
Plaintiff:
Vincent Kyle Taylor
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Mr. Walker, Dr. Nwakucha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Ruccinni v. Sgt Ross et al
as 2:2015cv05097
Defendant:
Ms Clark, Ms Clark, Correctional Officer J Makarde and others
Plaintiff:
John Ruccinni
Myron Nunn v. N.C. Legislation
as 15-6902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MYRON RODERICK NUNN
Defendant - Appellee:
N.C. LEGISLATION, FRANK PERRY, GEORGE T. SOLOMON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
