Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Campbell v. Taveras et al
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Campbell
Defendant:
Leydi Taveras, Ms. Kesha Townsel, Mr. Waliek Crandal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MADISON v. BERRY et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MADISON
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, MR CLARK, MR GARDENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Mays v. Jennifer Saad
as 23-7127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH RANDOLPH MAYS
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER SAAD, RICHARD HUDGINS, MS. R. THOMPSON and others
Williams v. G Shift Officers et al
as 8:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J. Williams
Defendant:
G Shift Officers, T. Stanton, Ms. R. Swearingen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoge v. Washburn et al
as 2:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Hoge, Jr.
Defendant:
Susan Washburn, Dr. Warren Roberts, Ms. Whitbread and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. R. Brookins
as 23-6033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. R. BROOKINS, PRISON GUARD MS. BRODY, NB POD MAINTENANCE PLUMBER and others
Scovens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00933
Plaintiff:
Leonard Scovens
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Dr. Taro Kurusu, Dr. Manuel Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. BROOKINS et al
as 1:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. R. BROOKINS, PRISON GUARD MS. BRODY, NB POD MAINTENCE DEPARTMENT PLUMBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diop v. Augustine et al
as 4:2021cv03915
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Drop and Tiffany Diop
Defendant:
Sgt Ms. F. Augustine and Ms. R. Zak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno v. M. Bluemling
as 21-7065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAZARO QUINONES-CEDENO
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. M. BLUEMLING, Teacher, MS. M. THOMPKIS, Supervisor, MS. J. RIDENOUR, Teacher and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
