Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Velosio, LLC v. Snipes et al
as 2:2022cv01928
Plaintiff:
Velosio, LLC
Defendant:
Daniel W Snipes and David N Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rich v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01088
Plaintiff:
Fatimah Rich and Fatimah N. Rich
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Faulkner v. Rich et al
as 5:2018cv05075
Defendant:
Robert Yantis, Kathryn N. Rich, Wade Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Gene Faulkner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merriman v. Lizarraga et al
as 2:2017cv01701
Plaintiff:
Dominique Merriman
Defendant:
J. Lizarraga, James Telander, Worrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. RICH et al
as 2:2016cv00099
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
JOSEPH L. RICH, LOUIS A. RICH, JR. and JAMES N. RICH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Vernon King, Jr. v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 16-40058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, STEVEN N. RICH, GENE A. KROLL and others
Vernon King, Jr. v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 15-40960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, STEVEN N. RICH, GENE A. KROLL and others
Rich et al v. Citimortgage, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00377
Plaintiff:
Robin D. Rich and Phillip N. Rich
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
W.R. VERNON PRODUCE CO. v. NICHOLS FOODSERVICE, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
W.R. VERNON PRODUCE CO.
Defendant:
NICHOLS FOODSERVICE, INC., JAMES L NICHOLS, III, BONNIE J EZZELL and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Vernon King, Jr. v. Steven Rich, et al
as 13-40315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN N. RICH, also known as Rich N. Steven, BRENDA CHANEY, SHARON D. ALLEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
