Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
LAMAR v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff: NATHAN LAMAR
Defendant: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION doing business as AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jones v. Bowns et al
as 1:2023cv00226
Petitioner: Nathan Lamar Jones
Respondent: N Bowns, W Davis, Pressly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathan Lamar Stewart v. United States
as 17-1064
Petitioner: Nathan Lamar Stewart
Respondent: United States of America
HEINRICH et al v. MCCORKLE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv03026
Defendant: BRUCE BAKER, RICHARD BOUSLOG, KIM CRONK and others
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER BAKER, HANNAH HEINRICH, JAMES KENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nathan Lamar Stewart v. United State
as 14-2673
Petitioner: Nathan Lamar Stewart
Respondent: United States of America
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2014mc00052
Respondent: JONATHAN ROBERT ANDERSON, MAX WAYNE APPLE, JILL MICHELLE ARNOLD and others
In Re: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Nathan Lamar Stewart v. United State
as 12-3319
Petitioner - Appellant: Nathan Lamar Stewart
Respondent - Appellee: United States of America
Stewart v. USA
as 0:2012cv01625
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Nathan Lamar Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States v. Nathan Lamar Stewart We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-3471
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant - Appellant: Nathan Lamar Stewart
Randolph v. Hinton et al
as 5:2010ct03080
Plaintiff: Nathan Lamar Randolph
Defendant: Alma Hinton, Johnathan E. Jones, Lisa Coltrain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?