Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Stotler et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 1:2026cv02096
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Stotler, Nicole Danielle Stotler and Nicole Danielle Pershing
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
USA v. Teafatiller
as 25-51054
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nicole Danielle Teafatiller
Daniels v. Denton County, et al.
as 4:2025cv01379
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Nicole Daniels
Defendant:
Denton County, Denton County Precinct 1 and Denton County Clerk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rougier v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv01520
Plaintiff:
Nicole Danielle Rougier
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Daniels-Carerro v. INOVA Health Care Services
as 1:2025cv01701
Defendant:
INOVA Health Care Services
Plaintiff:
Deshane Nicole Daniels-Carerro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
ROHRER v. BISIGNANO
as 5:2025cv05396
Plaintiff:
NICOLE DANIEL ROHRER
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
ROHRER v. BISIGNANO
as 2:2025cv05396
Plaintiff:
NICOLE DANIEL ROHRER
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Prather et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv02779
Plaintiff:
Rocky Prather, James Allen, Jr, Evric Asberry and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Prather et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv00370
Plaintiff:
Rocky Prather, James Allen, Jr, Evric Asberry and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
USA v. Nicole Devilbiss
as 24-12252
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NICOLE DANIELLE DEVILBISS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
