Cases 1 - 10 of 378
Hampton v. Cockrell et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hampton
Defendant:
James Cockrell, Andrew Gault, Richard Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noll v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
Richard Noll
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Noll v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Richard Noll
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Pritchard, et al. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois
as 23-4331
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PATRICIA PRITCHARD, as parent on behalf of minor C.P., NOLLE PRITCHARD, as parent on behalf of minor C.P., S.R. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF ILLINOIS
Salter v. 91 Jet, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00394
Counter Defendant:
Phil Salter
Defendant:
91 Jet, LLC, Jason M Noll and Jason M Noss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
NOLL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11810
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LEE NOLL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LIN-HENDEL et al v. DUPUIS et al
as 3:2023cv03956
Petitioner:
DR. CATHERINE G. LIN-HENDEL, PH.D. and DR. RUDOLF H. HENDEL, PH.D.
Respondent:
KATHERINE DUPIS, KAREN M. CASSIDY, THOMAS J. WALSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Murzike v. Putney et al
as 3:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Putney, Holly, Nolles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Komatsu v. Urban Pathways, Inc.
as 23-654
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
Urban Pathways, Inc., being sued in their individual and official capacities, Daniels Norelli Cecere & Travel PC, being sued in their individual and official capacities, Neighborhood Association for Inter-Cultural Affairs, Inc., being sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
