Cases 41 - 50 of 1,521
Flor Arriaza De Paredes v. Zen Nails Studio LLC
as 23-2309
Plaintiff:
FLOR I. ARRIAZA DE PAREDES and FRANCISCO HERNAN TEJADA LOPEZ
Defendant:
ZEN NAILS STUDIO LLC, PHONZ NGUYEN, a/k/a Dung Nen Chay Khach and LINH NGUYEN, a/k/a Nen Giu Khach Hai Long
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Nails v. Companies Using the Name Nails
as 2:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
Companies Using the Name Nails
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Angela Nails v. Lyft
as 2:2023cv10728
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
Lyft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Angela Nails v. Uber
as 2:2023cv10729
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
Uber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Garland v. Nail
as 1:2023cv05784
Petitioner:
Lemone Garland
Respondent:
Reginald Scandrett and Michael W. Nail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nails v. St Joesph's /Chandler et al
as 2:2023cv01734
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
St Joesph's /Chandler, Karen Turner and Dajaunia James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nail v. O'Malley
as 2:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Richard James Nail
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
National Nail Corp v. PrimeSource Building Products Inc
as 3:2023cv02746
Plaintiff:
National Nail, Corp. and National Nail Corp
Defendant:
PrimeSource Building Products, Inc. and PrimeSource Building Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
