Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Swint v. Nile International et al
as 4:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint
Defendant:
Nile International, Neenah Paper, Sylvamo Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Schramm v. Neenah Paper Michigan, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Thomas Schramm
Defendant:
Neenah Paper Michigan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scarfe v. Neenah Paper, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00901
Defendant:
Neenah Paper, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tammy Scarfe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Woodcock v. Neenah Paper, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00068
Plaintiff:
Gayle E. Woodcock
Defendant:
Neenah Paper, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Dame et al v. Neenah Paper, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv40029
Plaintiff:
Donald Dame , Paul Okerman , Richard Rushford and others
Defendant:
Neenah Paper, Inc. , FiberMark North America, Inc. and Crocker Technical Papers, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan for Hourly Retirees
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Garrett Day LLC et al v. International Paper Company et al
as 3:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
Garrett Day LLC and Ohio Development Services Agency
Defendant:
International Paper Company, Neenah Paper, Inc., Aetna Paper Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Weiss v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2011cv00103
Plaintiff:
Richard D Weiss
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company , Alfa Laval Inc, Amtico International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
