Cases 1 - 10 of 165
United States v. Nickols
as 24-5056
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GLENN DAVID NICKOLS, AKA Buck
Betancourt et al v. BronxCare Health System et al
as 1:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Osbed Betancourt and Nickole Hutchinson
Defendant:
BronxCare Health System and Shirley Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Moore v. Nickole et al
as 4:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
Lois Moore
Defendant:
Kaylie E Nickole and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
NICKOLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30923
Plaintiff:
BRAD NICKOLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore et al v. Truist Bank (TV2)
as 1:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Samuel Robert Moore and Nickole Renea Moore
Defendant:
Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Sumpter v. Butler et al
as 1:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
LaJuan Anthony Sumpter and Lajuan Sumpter
Defendant:
Reosha Butler, Jefferson S. Dunn and Officer Nickols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Robinson
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez, Bowers, Nickols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDavid v. Folkerth et al
as 1:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. McDavid
Defendant:
Nickoles Folkerth, Jessica Folkerth and Nicholas Folkerth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Immigration: Review of Denial of Naturalization Application
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
