Cases 21 - 30 of 114
Parrott v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 3:2020cv01662
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Barry Anthony English
Plaintiff:
James Wade Parrott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MINGO et al v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) et al
as 1:2020cv00226
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, ANDRE CHAMBERS, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) and others
Plaintiff:
Jace Hyman, Jaden Hyman, W. DANIEL GRIST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Walters v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2020cv00017
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo L. Walters
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Kitts v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2019cv00916
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Brandon Kitts
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
LEE et al v. EWART et al
as 1:2019cv01154
Plaintiff:
RONNIE W. LEE, II and AKRESHA LEE
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC., LARRY WAYNE EWART and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
AGNER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv01033
Defendant:
FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, GRINNELL LLC, GOULDS PUMPS (IPG), INC. and others
Plaintiff:
VONNIE K. AGNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hughett v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2019cv00669
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Austyn S. Hughett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lanigan v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2019cv00668
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
James Lanigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harding v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2019cv00222
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Venus L. Harding
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Simpson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2019cv00017
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Simpson
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
