Cases 61 - 70 of 189
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00892
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Thomas v. Norfolk Southrn Railway Company
as 1:2019cv02043
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Rufus Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Clark v. Parsec, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01925
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, PARSEC INC, Budco Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. PARSEC INC et al
as 5:2019cv00130
Defendant:
BUDCO GROUP INC, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, PARSEC INC and others
Plaintiff:
ELAINE CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In the Matter of GraeStone Logistics, LLC
as 1:2019cv00177
Not Yet Classified:
Claimants
Petitioner:
In the Matter of GraeStone Logistics, LLC
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cross Claimant:
David Erik Crumpton
Cross Defendant:
Parker Towing Company, Inc.
Brown v. Sylacauga Deluxe Cab Company Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00463
Plaintiff:
Darryl Dewayne Brown
Defendant:
Sylacauga Deluxe Cab Company Inc, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, William James Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Johnson v. Direct Chassislink, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00108
Defendant:
Direct Chassislink, Inc., Consolidated Chassis Management, LLC, Norfolk Southern Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Cleve Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CARMAN v. CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILROAD COMPANY et al
as 4:2018cv00203
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, J C BROCKMAN, SHANE KEYS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D CARMAN
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01591
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01364
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
