Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bradley Walker v. Wellpath
as 23-6102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRADLEY WAYNE WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLPATH, DR. JOSE J. CHAVEZ and NURSE PRACTITIONER BETH ROUSE
Defendant:
LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, LEXINGTON COUNTY, V. BOOKMAN, Classification Correctional Officer and others
Pitts v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
Kendal R Pitts
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Novac, Lagvnas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Lexington County Detention Center et al
as 5:2021cv03624
Plaintiff:
Bradley Wayne Walker
Defendant:
Lexington County Detention Center, Wellpath, Dr Jose J Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorne v. Norman et al
as 2:2021cv04190
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Thorne and Timothy J Thorne
Defendant:
Jeff Norman, Tabatha (unknown), Sgt (unknown) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montileaux v. Berg et al
as 3:2017cv03015
Plaintiff:
Miriam Chantel Montileaux
Defendant:
Darren Berg, William Schied, Nelda Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLAMER v. NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2016cv04012
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLAMER
Defendant:
NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL, HARRSCH and LISA NOVAC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. USA
as 5:2016cv00538
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Steven Novac Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Santiago v. Chuttey et al
as 9:2012cv01566
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Santiago
Defendant:
Chuttey, Mitchell, Witney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Chuttey et al
as 1:2012cv06112
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Santiago
Defendant:
Chuttey, Mitchell, Witney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Cox v. E. McDaniel, et al
as 12-16380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVE COX
Defendant - Appellee:
E. K. MCDANIEL, D. BROOKS, R. BAKER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
