Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rice v. Cecil County, MD et al
as 1:2023cv02344
Plaintiff:
Crystal Rice
Defendant:
Cecil County, Prime Care Medical Inc, Sheriff Scott A. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jackson v. NRADC et al
as 7:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Tyreik Dayshon Jackson
Defendant:
NRADC, Ofc. Dean, Nurse Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mazyck v. Medical Dept Well Path et al
as 5:2021cv03166
Plaintiff:
DaShawn Mazyck
Defendant:
Medical Dept Well Path, Hill Finklea Detention Center, Deanna Dingle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodley v. Reed et al
as 3:2021cv00615
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alroy Woodley
Defendant:
Harold Reed, Holmes, Lt. Kevin Talley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. PrimeCare Medical of West Virginia, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00382
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical of West Virginia, Inc., Dr. Alfred Baldera, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Brendon Tyre Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Greene v. David Ballard
as 20-6454
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH COOPER, Psy. Dr./MHU Staff, SHANNON COLEMAN, MHU Staff, KEN BOWLIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GREENE
Blount v. Jones et al
as 2:2019cv00641
Defendant:
K. Cosby, C/O Gregory, Ms. Anita L. Critton and others
Plaintiff:
Donell J. Blount, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOLTON v. KELLY et al
as 1:2019cv00449
Plaintiff:
ERIC BOLTON
Defendant:
NURSE KELLY and NURSE MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolton v. Kelly et al
as 5:2019ct03118
Plaintiff:
Eric Bolton
Defendant:
Nurse Kelly and Nurse Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. BARCELLONA et al
as 1:2018cv00486
Plaintiff:
MILO DANIEL TYLER
Defendant:
TOM BARCELLONA, R. B. HARKEY, SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
