Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 61
v. $4,698,514.00 in United States Currency et al
as 8:2024cv00160
Defendant: $4,698,514.00 in United States Currency, $2,033,094.98 in United States Currency, $630,680.00 in United States Currency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $25,002.05 seized from JPMorgan Chase Account ending in 9869, held in the name of Adejoke T. Olumodeji et al
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $25,002.05 seized from JPMorgan Chase Account ending in 9869, held in the name of Adejoke T. Olumodeji, $1,548.41 seized from JPMorgan Chase Account ending in 8717, held in the name of Adejoke T. Olumodeji, One Rolex Everose gold, 40 mm, model 228235 men's watch and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. 116 Rockbridge Greens Blvd., Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830
as 3:2023cv00363
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 116 Rockbridge Greens Blvd., Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Personal Property Miscellaneous Jewelry, seized from 7XX E. 11 Mile Road, Royal Oak, Michigan et al
as 2:2023cv10623
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Personal Property Miscellaneous Jewelry, seized from 7XX E. 11 Mile Road, Royal Oak, Michigan, Currency $71,129.00 U.S. Currency from the residence at 7XX E. Eleven Mile, Royal Oak, Michigan, Personal Property Miscellaneous Firearms and Ammunition, seized from 69XX Chimney Hill, Apt. 30XX, West Bloomfield, Michigan and others
Claimant: Pacino Horne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Real Property Known as 324 Oak Meadow Lane, Cedar Hill, TX et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00446
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Real Property Known as 324 Oak Meadow Lane Cedar Hill, TX, Real Property Known as 1015 Aries Street, Cedar Hill, TX, Real Property Known as 5605 S Cockrell Hill Road, Dallas, TX and others
Claimant: Venture Properties Inc., Dallas County, Cedar Hill Independent School District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
USA v. Oak Porcelli, et al
as 22-16499
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant: OAK PORCELLI and GINA PENNOCK
Defendant: $1,106,775.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
USA v. 1). Rifle AK-47 pistol, model MDLN-PAP, 7.62x39 caliber Serial Number PAP042331 et al
as 3:2022cv01434
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: 1). Rifle AK-47 pistol, model MDLN-PAP, 7.62x39 caliber Serial Number PAP042331, 2). Magazine Cal. 7.62x39, 3). Ammunition: Cal 7.62x39-(38 in total) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States Of America v. Twenty-Nine Thousand, Eight Hundred Dollars and 00/100 ($29,800.00) in United States Currency et al
as 1:2022cv00348
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Defendant: Twenty-Nine Thousand, Eight Hundred Dollars and 00/100 ($29,800.00) in United States Currency, An Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore Stainless Steel Watch with Diamonds and One Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore Stainless Steel Watch with Diamonds
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. One 14K Rose Gold & Diamond Ring
as 1:2021cv04425
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Assorted Jewelry Described in Attachment A, One 14K Rose Gold & Diamond Ring, Barcode No: A00233210, One 14k White Gold & Diamond Pendant, Barcode No: A00233210 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $94,215.89 FROM BB&T FUNDAMENTALS ACCOUNT ENDING IN 9435 et al
as 2:2021cv01056
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $94,215.89 FROM BB&T FUNDAMENTALS ACCOUNT ENDING IN 9435, $278,528.13 FROM UNITED BANK ACCOUNT ENDING IN 7370, $83,441.64 FROM UNITED BANK ACCOUNT ENDING IN 4982 and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?