Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Minton v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv01750
Plaintiff:
Robert Minton
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Atlanta Police Department, Officer Balmore Cruz and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wexler v. City of San Diego, California et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Marshall A. Wexler
Defendant:
City of San Diego, California, San Diego Police Department, Officer Madison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Davis v. Logan et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Officer Brandon Logan, Officer William Snyder, Capt. Wes Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leschinski v. Canton, Township of et al
as 2:2024cv10012
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Leschinski
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF CANTON, OFFICER BRANDON HAYFORD, ALEXIS DIVETTA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bruner v. Cassidy, et al
as 23-6216
Plaintiff:
LAQUITA BRUNER, as Administrator of the Estate of Dawawn Q. McCoy
Defendant:
OFFICER KELLY CASSIDY, an individual, OFFICER BRANDON LEE, an individual, OFFICER ROBIN RIDNER, an individual and others
SCOTT et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR. and CHRISTOPHER JAMES ROBERTS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL R. HARRY, JAMES C. BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SIDIBE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04540
Plaintiff:
MOUSSA SIDIBE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Shane Weber
as 23-7143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SHANE WEBER, CHIEF OF SECURITY KEITH ARNOLD, LT. JAMES SMITH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
