Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Todd Dean v. Mrs. Brown
as 24-6202
Plaintiff:
TODD GLENN DEAN
Defendant:
MRS. BROWN, Warden, MRS. BLUNT, Counselor, MR. PAYNE, Case Manager and others
Lacy v. Runion et al
as 2:2023cv02069
Plaintiff:
Charles David Lacy
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobe Runion, Officer Fletcher, Officer Kerry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Mrs. Brown, et al
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Todd G. Dean
Defendant:
Warden Mrs. Brown, Counselor, Case Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thomas v. Fletcher et al
as 2:2021cv01372
Plaintiff:
Morningstar Thomas
Defendant:
Officer Fletcher and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slusser v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2017cv00163
Plaintiff:
Rodney Ray Slusser
Defendant:
Erick Holcomb, Bill Dulin, Officer Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartford v. Osgood et al
as 3:2014cv05398
Plaintiff:
Ira Ray Hartford, IV
Defendant:
Dave Osgood, Kerry Dickman, Steve Petitt and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Bronson et al v. Village of Dalton et al
as 1:2011cv05231
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Bronson, III , Danielle K. Bronson , Mychal B. Davis and others
Defendant:
Village of Dalton, Illinois, Officer Gainer, Officer McMillan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Vertison v. Village of Dolton, et al.
as 1:2011cv03384
Plaintiff:
Julian Vertison
Defendant:
Village of Dolton, Robert Shaw, Robert E. Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Vilage of Dolton et al
as 1:2009cv03777
Plaintiff:
Paul Woods
Defendant:
Vilage of Dolton, Officer Fletcher and Unknown Dolton Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeLoach v. Crews et al
as 7:2006cv00123
Plaintiff:
Floyd DeLoach, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Crews, Sgt. Swain and Officer Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
