Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Benbow v. Klaus et al
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Aaron C. Benbow
Defendant:
Richard Klaus, Lt. Panarello, Deputy Warden Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Limpin v. Garland et al
as 3:2022cv01150
Plaintiff:
Melchor Karl T. Limpin
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Loretta E. Lynch, Officer Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 b Fed. Question: Bivens Act
O'Neal v. Hawkins et al
as 3:2022cv02227
Plaintiff:
Albert O'Neal
Defendant:
Major Hawkins and Officer Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lisle v. Lawrence et al
as 3:2019cv00427
Defendant:
Sergeant Jones, Nurse MarryAnn, Officer Porter and others
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Lisle and Steven D. Lisle, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Duffy et al
as 1:2018cv00436
Defendant:
Officer Crig, Justin Amaral, Captain Duffy and others
Plaintiff:
Lemuel O. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Thompson v. Major Friday et al
as 1:2018cv02186
Plaintiff:
Bryan C. Thompson
Defendant:
Officer Smith, Officer Porter, Officer Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jerome McDougald v. Esham, et al
as 17-3359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME MCDOUGALD
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT ESHAM, LIEUTENANT JOSEPH, CORRECTIONS OFFICER QUEEN and others
Michael Wheeler, et al v. Jersey City Police Department, et al
as 16-1904
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL WHEELER and CARVISSA WHEELER
Defendant - Appellee:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL MEADE, POLICE OFFICER PORTER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
POLICE OFFICER MARK HENNESSY, SERGEANT TIMOTHY O'BRIEN and POLICE OFFICER G. VEGA, Badge No. 2803
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
