Cases 1 - 10 of 100
McGill v. LOreal USA, Inc., et al
as 1:2026cv14061
:
Service List
Defendant:
Dabur International Ltd., Namaste Laboratories LLC, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ola McGill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv13118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Murray v. James et al
as 4:2026cv04827
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Murray
Defendant:
Warden Tonya James, A/W Jason Smith, Lt Shane Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Carroll v. Campbell County Department of Social Services/CPS et al
as 6:2026cv00127
Plaintiff:
Alisha Bell Carroll
Defendant:
Campbell County Department of Social Services/CPS, Ola Anaebonam, Supervisor Tiffany Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Burnham et al
as 6:2026cv04384
Plaintiff:
Eugene D. Green
Defendant:
Kevin Burnham, Rhonda Williams, Ola Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
