Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Humbert v. Marshall et al
as 3:2026cv02040
Plaintiff: Eric Humbert
Defendant: William K. Marshall, Michael Pugh, Marrcus Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ONUOHA v. NORTH HUNTINGTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2026cv00908
Plaintiff: ANTHONY ONUOHA
Defendant: NORTH HUNTINGTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and OFFICER JACK C. PACKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ONUOHA v. FRANCIS
as 1:2026cv01746
Plaintiff: ANTHONY CHINEMELUM ONUOHA
Defendant: FRANCIS and ALL PARTIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Onuoha v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2026cv01434
Plaintiff: Anthony Onuoha
Defendant: City of Seattle, Seattle Police Department, Dominic Trainor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Curated Sounds LLC et al
as 1:2026cv02908
Plaintiff: Sergio Garcia
Defendant: Curated Sounds LLC a limited liability corporation doing business as Inner Circle Music Group, Brian Onuoha and Dvante Hemphill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dj Fed. Question: Declaratory Judgment
USA v. Anagha Onuoha
as 25-14038
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ANAGHA EMEKA ONUOHA
McNeal v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2025cv13128
Plaintiff: Cory Dewayne McNeal
Defendant: Tara Warren, Jude Onuoha and Mr. Andres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Ahamad Atkins v. Onuoha Jude
as 25-6470
Plaintiff: AHAMAD ATKINS
Defendant: ONUOHA JUDE, TARA WARREN and FCI BENNETTSVILLE SC
Onuoha v. Fort Myer Construction Corporation
as 8:2025cv01623
Plaintiff: Ahamefula Onuoha
Defendant: Fort Myer Construction Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Motor Vehicle
Atkins v. F.C.I. Bennettsville
as 8:2024cv03753
Defendant: Tara Warren and Onuoha Jude
Plaintiff: Ahamed Atkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?