Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Amersi v. Sheridan et al
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Amin Amersi
Defendant:
John F Sheridan, Leigh A Vosseller, Brian B Hansen and others
Bushansky v. Sheridan et al
as 3:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
John F Sheridan, Rebecca B Robertson, Dick P Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Federal Communications Act of 1934
Mason v. Booth et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Akeem C. Mason
Defendant:
Booth, Wesley Townsend and P. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Tristan J Hall
Defendant:
Charme P Allen, William C Bright and Hector I Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'QUINN v. VICE et al
as 4:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M O'QUINN
Defendant:
VICE, N OLDS, GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Henry, Sr. et al
as 3:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Ryan P. Allen
Defendant:
Stephen L. Henry, Sr., Steven Petticrew and Clark County Ohio Department of Probation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04653
Plaintiff:
Whitney Allen and James P Allen
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sheffield v. Harper et al
as 3:2023cv00597
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Sheffield
Defendant:
E. Harper, G. J. Gabrielli, L. Corbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Missouri v. Allen et al
as 8:2023cv01990
Plaintiff:
Vincent Missouri
Defendant:
John P Allen, Brian Kendall, Bryan Stirling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Melvin King, III v. Ta'Kisha Fitzgerald, et al
as 23-5155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN R. KING, III
Defendant / Appellee:
TA'KISHA FITZGERALD, STEVEN W. SWORD, RANDALL E. NICHOLS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
