Cases 51 - 60 of 112
(PS) Ervin v. Jones et al
as 2:2019cv01883
Plaintiff:
Gary Wayne Ervin
Defendant:
James Drennan, Don Nottoli, Robert Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe et al v. Griffin
as 2:2019cv00126
Plaintiff:
Gina Fries, Michael Gray, Michael Smith and others
Defendant:
Kathy Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NESSMITH et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03077
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOWLES, ALLAN EUROZA, DANIEL YOON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nessmith et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02081
Plaintiff:
James Bowles, Allan Euroza, Daniel Yoon and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Johnson v. Renwick, et al.
as 1:2019cv01452
Defendant:
Peter James Albert, Andre Ashley Craig, Gregory Eugene Schwartz and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORTEZ v. SULTAN AL HITHALAYN et al
as 1:2019cv01642
Defendant:
MARYPAT WRIGHT, RICK SCOTT, SARA ALMALIK and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balarezo et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11911
Plaintiff:
Demetrios Kaloudakis, Patrick Keane, Anthony Barzelatto and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Tate et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv07439
Defendant:
Jennifer Burmistrz, James D. Cascone, Michael Higgins and others
Plaintiff:
Legend Booth, E'Monie Booth, Ebony Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Kennedy v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-50539
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL PATRICK KENNEDY
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Kennedy v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2018cv00117
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Michael Patrick Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
