Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
National Association of Tobacco Outlets, Inc. et al v. City of Worcester, Massachusetts et al
as 4:2011cv40110
Plaintiff:
National Association of Tobacco Outlets, Inc. , R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company , Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Massachusetts, Division of Public Health of Worcester, Massachusetts, B. Dale McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Coleman v. Newport Cigarette
as 11-671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jason Coleman
Defendant - Appellee:
Newport Cigarettes, Malboro Cigarettes, Philip Morris USA and others
Coleman v. Newport Cigarettes et al
as 1:2010cv08770
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Coleman
Defendant:
Newport Cigarettes, Malboro Cigarettes, Philip Morris USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv03572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PALMER v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv02624
Plaintiff:
MINNIE PALMER
Defendant:
PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., JENNIFER BIRD and DANIEL AFFRONTI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis v. Philip Morris USA INC.
as 2:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Davis
Defendant:
Philip Morris USA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
