Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03039
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ronald Stockton v. John Wetzel, et al
as 25-3027
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of Corrections, LARCASS, C.O., D. J. CLOSE, Deputy and others
Ballard v. Hagel et al
as 1:2025cv02876
Plaintiff:
Deandre T. Ballard
Defendant:
Richard Hagel, Jr., Michael Porta and Trooper Tebbens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Joyce #251901 v. Sprango et al
as 1:2025cv00900
Plaintiff:
Cedric R. Joyce #251901
Defendant:
Unknown Sprango, Sherri Gregurek, Marcia K. Duma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-4350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv03702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. COMLY ROAD HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 2:2025cv00279
Plaintiff:
ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
COMLY ROAD HOLDINGS, LLC, LUCKY 13 UNLIMITED, LLC doing business as THE UNION TAP, STEPHANIE PAPPAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Arbab v. LaPorta et al
as 3:2024cv02045
Plaintiff:
Bijan Arbab
Defendant:
Brian La Porta, Brian LaPorta, Michael La Porta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
BAX v. PORTA et al
as 3:2024cv00224
Defendant:
C.O. JENKINS, C.O. JOHN DOE, LIEUTENANT SHICK and others
Plaintiff:
TEVIN BAX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
