Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jesse Pyles v. Shelby Houston, et al
as 26-2790
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wayne Pyles
Defendant:
Shelby Houston, Lieutenant/Correctional Officer, Wrightsville Unit, Tiffany Mixon, Sergeant/Correctional Officer, Wrightsville Unit and Moses Jackson, III, Warden, Wrightsville Unit
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv10804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Chris deLeon v. Margaret Fox
as 26-2185
Plaintiff:
CHRIS DELEON
Defendant:
MARGARET FOX, OFFICER CHARLES PYLES, #3228 in his individual and official capacities, OFFICER JOHN DOE 2, in his individual and official capacities and others
Cieza et al v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
as 2:2026cv10825
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cieza and Gonzalo Caduhada III
Defendant:
A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Christianson v. GLAUS, PYLE, SCHOMER, BURNS & DEHAVEN, INC.
as 8:2026cv02333
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Christianson
Defendant:
GLAUS, PYLE, SCHOMER, BURNS & DEHAVEN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Snyder v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
as 1:2026cv03074
Plaintiff:
Leroy N. Snyder, III
Defendant:
A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Pyle v. The Associated Press et al
as 5:2026cv04129
Plaintiff:
John Pyle
Defendant:
The Associated Press, Cal Sports Media, LLC and John Green
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
ROMAN v. HARRY et al
as 3:2026cv01318
Plaintiff:
ANIBAL ROMAN
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, MELISSA HAINSWORTH, MELANIE PYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
