Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Rua v. Glodis, et al
as 14-2158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWIN A. RUA
Defendant - Appellee:
GUY W. GLODIS, Office of the Sheriff, KATHY WISNIEWSKI and THOMAS R. PATNAUDE, Former Primary Care Physician
Defendant:
SUE ROGERS, Medical Department MD, GERALDINE SOMERS, Present/Primary Care Physician, PAMELA A. JONES, Medical Department Nurse and others
Jones v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00789
Plaintiff:
Pamela Kay Jones
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:14-cv-18717
Plaintiff:
Pamela Kay Jones
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Jones v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv18717
Plaintiff:
Pamela Kay Jones
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00694
Plaintiff:
Mark Steven Jones and Pamela Ann Jones
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pamela Jones v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 14-2198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Pamela L. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Jones et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00871
Plaintiff:
Pamela D Jones and Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet Manufacturing Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jones v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09558
Plaintiff:
Pamela M. Jones
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv32756
Plaintiff:
Pamela D. Jones and Victor L. Jones
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
